Tuesday, December 10, 2019

System Process of Preparation of Architects †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the System Process of Preparation of Architects. Answer: Introduction: Humans have always formed societies that have helped them to stay as a group and surviving as a group is always more logical. Without a proper society no civilization has ever thrived or can hope to survive if a basic structure is not present. To maintain this structure, it is of paramount importance to plan for the society: how will it function or a set of guidelines defining how should it be functioning (Carmon Fainstein, 2013). In order to make sure that this structure is maintained and operates accordingly, social planning is the tool that has been used throughout the ages, even if the term was not coined until very recently. Human structures have always needed basic formations and planning that have helped the humans to stay and live as a society. Social planning is necessary for humans, both as individuals and as part of the society (Ridley-Duff Bull, 2015). Social planning aims to improve the overall situations which make living and life easier for the members of the group. Social planning encompasses every aspect and unit of every human structure and groups. The prime objective of social planning is to address and come up with possible solutions for every critical issue and problems that are being faced by the society (Nikonova, 2014). Social planning can be done using two basic methods: top down or bottom up. The first approach decides on and tries to mitigate issues as the authorities decide, the issues they think to be important or what they consider to be trivial. The second approach to social planning addresses social problems from the perspective of the masses, what the general people of the society deem as important (Fainstein, 2017). Very simply put, social planning refers to the process where humans, as a single community acting as a single entity, identify its own strengths and weaknesses and then determine ways which would help to solve the issues and improve the overall quality of life of the entire society. As an umbrella term, social planning may include planning for any social service program and policies as well as implementation of those policies (Weil, Reisch Ohmer, 2013). Essentially, social planning is done by members of the society for other members of the society. This means, from a very ideological sense, social planning aims to resolve any issues that directly and negatively impacts the members of the society. Social planning looks into any problem and issue that may exists within the societal structure and innumerable perspectives are gained on every matter as every individual has unique ways of looking into every situation and issue. Social planning has been defined as a system that is both loc al and democratic in nature that is used to setting priorities for the society and then agreeing on possible solutions to that problem followed by taking actions to mitigate those issues (Nikonova, 2014). Social planning supports the needs of the community and social, cultural, economic and environmental interests. Social planning demands a lot of activities to be done and a number of tasks to be executed. In a generic sense, social planning describes the planning of social services that are aimed towards improving the quality of life in a community. If such planning is done at a community level, social planning is often referred to as neighbourhood planning (Paris, 2013). A social planning body or organisation can also serve as the leader of a community and has the authority and capability to bring together bands of people focused to resolve key social issues. Social planning also often includes providing recommendations and advices to civic bodies that facilitate in making public policy. This can be done because social planning mostly looks into social issues and aims to come up with their viable solutions and other activities that would enhance the overall quality of the community as a whole. Social planning is identified as one of the three primary and most important models of community org anisations including social action and community development (Weil, Reisch Ohmer, 2013). Most social plannings are done by individuals as part of an agency while designing a program that seeks to address social needs and achieve social justice. The primary target of social planning is to solve a problem that affects all members of the society. The individuals or agencies that do social planning gather data on different social issues and decide which of them are the most pressing and needs immediate mitigation. Then, the collected data is analysed, decisions are then taken, which are logical and focused around a central issue. Different feasible solutions are thought of and then the planners decide collectively on the best possible solution, which are to be the basis of the planning (Wheeler Beatley, 2014). The planning is then commenced and ideas are put into action. Applied research techniques such as assessing needs and program evaluation are used to help in methods that aid soc ial planning and in policy analysis. The objectives and aims of social planning serve many criterions that help the members to live ethically within the society through establishing social justice that seeks to provide equity, equality and an array of rights to the people. All of these come together to enhance the quality of life of the people who are part of the community or the global society (Parker, 2017). Social planning is done with a very objective in mind: how to improve the overall community cohesion and interactions of all the members of the community. To improve the condition of social inclusion and preventing social exclusion of certain groups and individuals are also helped through social planning. Social planning is the pivotal instrument to create communities and societies, both regional and global, that are a good place to live in, that has well to do economies, community integrity and a good social cohesion. At the core of any social planning lies some basic core competencies that are the parameters of any major decision making. Some of these are: community development, protecting the cultural heritage, economic development and increasing employment levels, ensuring health and safety of the members of the society, recreation band recreational planning, achieving an identity of the community, social inclusion, human services planning and creating and maintaining a sense of identity. Social identity grows when all the people who live in a specific region, both the original natives as well as the people who came there later on, come together to form a community that live and grow side by side, cooperating each other. The aims and objectives of social planning seeks to give eve ryone a place within the community through working with every member to achieve the highest possible level of social and individual wellbeing. It is the task of social planning to make sure every member is given social justice and a sense of equality prevails throughout the entire community where no one is deprived and a social balance is maintained. No discriminatory actions are encouraged in the social planning process. A code of ethics has to be maintained so as to ensure that no member acts out of place or does something that harms another member in any way. If in order to keep someone well, another has to be deprived in some sort, then a social equality or social justice cannot be achieved (Leigh Blakely, 2016). Every social planning gives any person with any form of disability or disadvantage the independence and option to choose and lead a life as they fit. This is the basic platform of any social planning: to give everyone the freedom to choose as long as it does not adversely affect anyone else. If a social equality is to be maintained, it must be taken care such that everyone gets the dignity and respect they deserve (Allmendinger, 2017). No one should ever be made to feel that they are unwanted or not valued as a member of the community. Social inclusion should be ensured and all should be part of the society. The Australian Association of Social Workers Ltd (AASW) strive towards creating a code of ethics that not only looks into all these aspects, but ensures that these are achieved. The constitution of AASW include compliance with the code of ethics that are drawn and serve as guidelines to develop a community through social planning, a strong held belief in the notion that every hum an is equal and therefore, is subjected to be treated so, a commitment to the democratic society of Australia and ensuring equality by law, respect for others, establishing justice, equity and fairness, accepting the unique nature of every individual (Allmendinger, 2017). The AASW advocates cooperation to achieve any social construct maintain the idea that collaboration is the foundation stone to any effective practice. Commitment to social justice is essential if a society looks to build a strong cohesion among its members and grow together without having to leave anyone behind (Hepworth et al, 2016). Every social worker is committed to actions that respect diversity that are based on anti-oppressive principles that seek to prevent and eliminate any sort of discrimination based on place of origin, culture, race, ethnicity, gender, language spoken, sexual preference and orientation, religious views, political affiliation and social and economic condition (Faludi, 2013). It is the duty of every social worker to empower individuals and they are part of any group like community, society or family. The Australian social setting promotes the acceptance and respect to the native people as they are the original people who own the lands. With the rise of new views and perceptions on different social issues, one of the most important things that have been widely in discussion in todays world is how to ensure the people with disabilities to have a life that is equal with all the members of the social and not be discriminated upon in any way (De Roo Hillier, 2016). Modern social planning aims to bridge any gaps that are currently in existence that render the disable members of a community to face discriminations. While it is true and an established fact that social planning does help people to be treated as equals and an overall development of the community, it is also true that social planning does, at times, harbor social exclusion and even create situations that pose as a disadvantage for the society. Segregation is often seen as a direct result of social planning (Allmendinger, 2017). In many instances, social plans have been made to improve the condition of a city or any particular area only at the cost of removing whole neighbourhoods of people who all belonged to a lower income group. In cases like this, it becomes tough to see it as an example of proper planning which is inclusive of all segments of the society (Weil, Reisch Ohmer, 2013). Deliberate social planning is a problem on occasions and leads to planned segregation. But it must be remembered that, even if there are nugatory effects of a social plan, the initial motive of the plan may have been good, which went astray. In othe r occasions, it may be intentional and these are the times when social exclusion is promoted rather than inclusion (Barr, 2017). This propagation of social exclusion cannot possibly hope to be the tool or path that leads the entire community towards a better condition or offer a better way of life. People with disabilities are often made to feel like they are not wanted, or they consider themselves to be second-class citizens within their own community (Nikonova, 2014). The Royal Adelaide Hospital that has only been constructed does not have toilets with change tables that help the disabled patients or relatives of patients who have disabilities. Only the spinal ward had these facilities while no other ward was fortunate enough to access these advantages. Situations like these are when social justice is not achieved and the community lacks social cohesion. Social planning is most definitely the single most important way to ensure social justice. It also helps societies to attain greatness and an overall better quality. Despite the fact that social planning at times results in events and situations that are highly contradictory to its initial purpose, it must be remembered that the initial cause of any social planning is to enhance the quality of a group or community while including every member in it. Even if social planning does not yield proper results, it should be noted that the purpose of social planning is to improve peoples lives, even if one particular case shows arguable results. References Allmendinger, P. (2017).Planning theory. Springer. Barr, H. (2017). Defining social studies.Teachers and curriculum,1(1). Carmon, N., Fainstein, S. S. (Eds.). (2013).Policy, planning, and people: promoting justice in urban development. University of Pennsylvania Press. De Roo, G., Hillier, J. (2016).Complexity and planning: Systems, assemblages and simulations. Routledge. Fainstein, S. S. (2017). URBAN PLANNING AND SOCIAL JUSTICE.The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. Faludi, A. (2013).A reader in planning theory(Vol. 5). Elsevier. Hepworth, D. H., Rooney, R. H., Rooney, G. D., Strom-Gottfried, K. (2016).Empowerment Series: Direct Social Work Practice: Theory and Skills. Nelson Education. Leigh, N. G., Blakely, E. J. (2016).Planning local economic development: Theory and practice. Sage Publications. Nikonova, E. R. (2014). System approach in modeling the process of preparation of architects for the professional activity in the course of the development of social planning in high school.Perspectives of Science Education,7(1). Paris, C. (Ed.). (2013).Critical Readings in Planning Theory: Urban and Regional Planning Series. Elsevier. Parker, J. (2017).Social work practice: Assessment, planning, intervention and review. Learning Matters. Ridley-Duff, R., Bull, M. (2015).Understanding social enterprise: Theory and practice. Sage. Weil, M., Reisch, M. S., Ohmer, M. L. (Eds.). (2013).The handbook of community practice. Sage. Wheeler, S. M., Beatley, T. (Eds.). (2014).Sustainable urban development reader. Routledge.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.